2006年9月29日 星期五

台灣過氣藝人與舊時代的最後溫存

台灣過氣藝人與舊時代的最後溫存

在電視轉播的倒扁回動中,最讓我感動的,是見到台灣的過氣藝人們與舊時代最後溫存的場景。
大部分跑到凱達格蘭大道的藝人們,有著與施明德等人共同的特點,那就是,他們是擁抱舊時代的、是被新時代遺忘中失落的一群人。在他們緬懷的舊時代裡,國民黨是這社會唯一的真理,不會有總統直選、公民投票、政黨政治所帶來的多元價值錯亂。只要稍微戴個墨鏡,留個長髮,甚至創作裡放幾個煽情暗喻的字眼,就可以讓一些沒有什麼真才實料的歌手紅透半邊天。也有一些人可以裝扮清純,在台灣人民為爭取民權努力奮戰的時代,為國民黨淨化人心,走不食人間煙火的校園路線,也可以輕易地得到萬人崇拜。

最不能讓他們這些過氣藝人們忘情的,是過去那個年代裡,他們曾是舞台正中間的主角。而現在,新舞台裡早已沒有了他們的位置。

歲月不饒人,娛樂世界的舞台早已換上一批一批的新生代上場,這些人在台灣的舞台早已經消失了。一個個過氣藝人為了生存,拿著他們十幾二十年前的老歌、過氣的造型、還有放在當今時空下顯得土味十足的表演方式,前進中國,想藉著剩餘價值在中國掏金。希望在一個娛樂產業的荒地裡,可以找到欣賞台灣舊時代藝人的知音。

可惜,事情總是事與願違。流浪中國異鄉的台灣過氣藝人們,在中國,總是被歸類為"港台藝人"這一類,與"內地藝人"壁壘分明,先天上的血統差異,也使得過氣台灣藝人在中國的發展總是成就有限,除了在中國國家慶典的表演上被中國政府拿來當統戰的樣板外,在娛樂產業裡總是無法得到中國媒體與民眾的廣泛肯定。更令人唏噓的是,當這些過氣的台灣巨星們在中國遇到了稚嫩的"超級女聲",亦或是網路上莫名其妙出現的一隻"老鼠"愛大米,也不得不敗下陣來,跑回台灣。

終於,這些過氣藝人們買了機票專程從中國回到台灣,在凱達格蘭大道上找到了僅存的溫暖舞台,諷刺的是這舞台是由他們以前曾經認定是大壞蛋的美麗島事件江洋大盜 - 施明德先生,為他們在凱達格蘭大道上所搭建的。

在凱達格蘭的紅色舞台上,羅大佑、李恕權、小蟲、趙詠華、張小燕、凌峰等人,找到了一起緬懷舊時代的同志,他們找到為了倒扁而給他們溫暖掌聲的一群知音。過氣的創作藝人們用著他們所熟悉的過時曲調,譜出一首首鼓勵人們用舊時代的老方法推倒新時代民主制度的歌曲。在他們唱著唱著紅了眼框的集體自我治療儀式中,我發覺這些過氣藝人們與舊時代的最後溫存,竟是如此地感傷與悽美。

tipping888

2006年9月25日 星期一

施明德與他的紅衣人是真正支持貪腐的人

為什麼我說施明德與他的紅衣人們是真正支持貪腐的人,因為:

1. 他們破壞前人努力,台灣好不容易從戒嚴下的專制集權走向受到世人肯定的民主的社會,現在施明德這一群號稱民主先進的人,不但不教育民眾使用民主國家的方式取得執政權,反而鼓動民眾採用舊時代的方式,方法上是完全反民主的,反而將台灣社會帶向災難!

2. 請問泛藍,為什麼反對直接民主?當初為何不支持無限制的公投法?現在為什麼只懂得用包圍脅迫的方式,而不懂得用修法、或是修憲的方式解決爭議。

當初蔡同榮版的公投法,不對公投議題與範圍設限,若是通過,你現在就可以提案公投罷免總統,當初你們為何要反對公投法,連戰與馬英九為何千方百計阻礙台灣人民實行直接民權的公投法,拿出中共來恐嚇人民公投會帶來災難,結果搞出一套現在綁死你們倒扁之路的公投法。

你們不從制度上給台灣人民權力,反而用街頭包圍的方式要趕民選總統下台,照你們的方式,這樣才會在未來製造出一個一個的貪腐政權,都無法可管,每一次都要用街頭包圍的方式來趕總統下台。所以我認為,施明德跟紅衣人才是支持貪腐的人。因為他們害怕在法制上給人民反貪腐的直接權力。這就是施明德的個人英雄主義作祟。

3. 請問泛藍,為什麼總是反對修憲?你們覺得許多憲法不合理,罷免總統門檻太高,那你是國會最大黨,為什麼不主張修憲?你們害怕什麼?為什麼台灣人長久要忍受一部不合身的憲法?現在憲法上對總統的保障箝制住你們的倒扁鬥爭運動,那你們為什麼不提出修憲?你們害怕什麼?

是否說穿了,其實你們不是在反貪腐,只是在反對陳水扁?你們害怕要是修憲給了人民權力,往後你們若有機會執政,人民也用同樣的標準檢視你們的貪腐,使用人民獲得的權力把你們從總統位子上拉下來?

請問泛藍、請問施明德,請問紅衣群眾,你們怕什麼?你們為什麼怕民主?你們為什麼怕公投?你們為什麼怕修憲?你們為什麼怕所有可以給台灣人民的合法權力?你們是不是其實只是想要倒扁,不想要民主法制?你們是不是其實只是想要耍弄群眾成就自己,但不想給人民直接的民主權力?你們是不是怕台灣的民主化,有一天會反噬了你們執政的機會?你們倒底怕什麼?

還是,其實只是因為你們在扁政府裡沒有撈到你想要的權力,所以現在你們只好支持一個在2000年跟2004年,兩度被台灣人民唾起的貪腐政權借屍還魂而已。

白痴!我不支持貪腐,真正支持貪腐的是紅衣人

謝謝許多讀者的回應與來信挑戰我的觀點,個人非常高興有人可以做理性的論辯。

但我覺許多人似是而非的論調,總是將"反貪腐"當作鬥爭的工具。當了政客的打手,還以為自己是正義之師,我覺得有需要指出這些施明德與紅衣人的一些盲點。

1. 我當然支持反貪腐,相信台灣大部分人都會支持反貪腐這個訴求。但反對貪腐,不代表反對陳水扁總統。因為陳水扁總統在司法調查的結論與法庭上拿得出來的證據提出來以前,陳水扁不等於貪腐。因此,在現階段我反對紅衣人和施明德的做法,並不等於支持貪腐,也不等於支持陳水扁總統。這樣簡單的邏輯,紅衣人可以理性的接受嗎?你看我在任何文章中挺過陳水扁總統嗎?我反對的是你們紅衛兵式的倒扁鬥爭做法

2. 一個人有沒有犯罪,不是某些媒體與政客24小時在電視媒體上隨便想當然爾的說說就算,一個人有沒有犯罪是需要檢察官來起訴,法官來判決。為什麼不能等待司法調查與判決,反而要利用群眾的力量,對檢察官與司法系統施壓。台灣不是一個五權分立的國家嗎?絕大部分的群眾,包括施明德本人,都沒有看過或調查過陳水扁總統的犯罪證據吧,那你怎麼帶這麼多人上街頭,施明德,你是個負責任的男人嗎?
你們不是前一陣子還在為搞軌案的李泰安崇拜與瘋狂嗎?許多資深媒體人不是告訴你們李泰安是無辜的嗎?當他後來被檢察官拿出證據起訴,你們怎麼都沒了聲音?這告訴你們也告訴我自己,要等待擁有司法調查權與審判權的機構調查與審判,才會讓真相水落石出。

3. 施明德與紅衣人,你們只是利用"反貪腐"包裝你們對陳水扁總統的討厭與鬥爭而已,讓人瞧不起。
你們從2000年陳水扁當上總統後,就到處反對他,處處阻礙他的施政到今天,你們自己想想,說穿了,就是因為你們支持的對象,總是因為自己不爭氣,選舉選輸了。現在,換上一個"反貪腐"的新包裝要強迫他下台,你們覺得,"反貪腐"這三個字你們說出來不會覺得氣弱游絲,毫無說服力?當你們紅衣人面對總統府時,背後是一座大貪腐的國民黨賣掉的中央黨部大樓,你背後那個國民黨不是非營利的政黨嗎?怎麼當了在野黨,還有好幾百億的資產,要反貪腐的話,請你馬上回過頭用同樣的標準來檢視馬英九,總不能馬家兩代依附著這個貪腐的國民黨生活與成長連震東、連戰、連勝文三代人依附國民黨,享盡富貴榮華,然後連戰、馬英九當上主席後,就可以撇得一乾二淨,好像都是別人貪腐,自己不曾是這個貪腐共犯結構的一員,馬英九,連戰,宋楚瑜,許信良,你們都享用過國民黨貪腐來的髒錢吧

拜託你們勇敢一點,反扁就是反扁,把"反扁"大聲說出來,不要假猩猩的用"反貪腐"包裝掩飾,你們遮遮掩掩的反扁在我眼中像個過街老鼠,完全沒有立場可言。

紅衣人比你們的紅衛兵祖師爺還遜,因為你們要搞鬥爭,還不敢大聲講出來,要鬥倒陳水扁總統請你們大聲講出來,勇敢的站起來搞鬥爭,沒人叫你們静坐、沒人叫你們跪,要搞革命還那麼扭扭捏捏、朝九晚五的在那裡唱愛國歌曲兼搞封建思想做什麼呢?

2006年9月23日 星期六

A Suspicious Link between PRC and Anti-Chen Campaign

More and more information reveals a suspicious relationship between Shih Ming-Teh's(施明德) anti-Chen Shui-Bian Campaign and the People Republic of China(PRC). People might finally awares that their Anti-Chen campaign could be supported by a country that wants to take over their homeland Taiwan. Some clues are:

1. Right before anti-Chen campaign, Mr. Shih Ming-Teh went to Thailand to meet Chen Yu-Hao(陳由豪), a notorious businessman who was involved in several business scandals in Taiwan. Chen Yu-Hao was eventually found to use money laundry to draw out shareholder's money and illegally move those money to fund his business venture in China. Chen Yu-Hao was issued a warrant for arrest by Taiwan government. Chen Yu-Hao attempted to bring down President Chen in several unsucceeful events since 2004.

2. An anti-Chen campaign activist, Lin Zheng-Jie(林正杰), who has long been involved in promoting unificaion between Taiwan and China, not only lives and works in China but also brings a group of gang leaders together in China to support his political ambition. Lin Zheng-Jie returned to Taiwan and organized a group of female gangsters to support anti-Chen campaign. Lin Zheng-Jie's recent violent action was to publicly hit a commentator badly during a live TV talk show a week before anti-Chen campaign started. His violent action was widely regarded as to intentionally stir up the heat between opposite parties.


3. The use of red color as symbol of anti-Chen campaign. The decision makers who lead anti-Chen campaign are all veteran politician in Taiwan. No one believes they did not aware the sensitivity of using red color that could offend against Taiwanese people and could mix up their demand with other political intentions. If Shih Ming-Teh's campaign is to seek majority of Taiwanese support of anti-corruption, how could those campaign leaders neglect the historical implication of red color in Taiwanese political spectrum?

More information could be disclosed in coming weeks. Let's wait and see what's going on and who's behind them.

2006年9月21日 星期四

台灣人, 你打錯了對象, 你的敵人是媒體, 不是紅衣人

「台灣人, 你打錯了對象, 你的敵人是媒體, 不是紅衣人」

這兩天在台南和高雄相繼發生了倒扁與挺扁間的暴力事件,令人痛心。

我想告訴單純的台灣鄉親,紅衣人倒扁挑釁雖然無理,但他們也有表達愚蠢意見的自由。單純的南部人雖然怨嘆沒有人聽你們的心聲,因為所有事件的詮釋與解釋的權力,都被那些台北媒體所掌握,你們的怒氣我可以理解,但暴力行為卻不應該被允許。

我想笑你們的單純,因為你們的確打錯了對象,你們要對付的不是單純的紅衣人,而是後面那些幫你們寫好劇本,布置好衝突場景,架好攝影機,等著你們來當臨時演員的台北媒體。

這些媒體後面,聽說,有的背後已經有中資進入,有的媒體與媒體人為了未來要進軍中國市場,言論開始泛紅,你沒聽過中國共產黨說要"以商促政"嗎?

這 些媒體,才是單純的台灣人應該示威的對象。不管藍綠,你們沒發現紅色的手已經藉由各種方式,深入、甚至主宰你們的政治活動了嗎?你們怎麼不去問問組織紅 衣人的那一群領導人,是怎麼樣搞出一個白癡的紅色創意?是那個狗腿商人想出來的點子?這個商人是不是想去中國做生意?我不知道,請你們告訴我。

單純的台灣人,請把抗爭的對象搞清楚,你要對抗的是那些被染紅的台北媒體與媒體人,是那些老早架好攝影機等你們上鉤的台北媒體,你要向這些媒體示威抗議,不是對那些跟你一樣單純的紅衣同胞拳腳相向。

請 一人一信或一通電話,打電話給你選區的立法委員,請他們鎖定一兩家媒體,向台北市政府申請集會遊行,集中火力向媒體合法的進行示威抗議。南部到台北距離 有點遠,所以請一定要集中力量,不要分散。十萬人來台北或許趕不走廣場上的紅衣人,但絕對可以讓一兩家電視台關門。有一些台北媒體可能就是這些紅衣人的地 下工廠,請將這些媒體在台北的地圖上標出來,請用台灣人民的力量將這些地下工廠關閉。

紅衣人不是在10月10號要"天下圍攻"嗎? 或許,台灣人民這天真要好好避開紅衣人,來針對紅衣人的地下工廠來個"直搗黃龍"。

(我 這個部落格的所有內容,歡迎台灣人民自由轉貼轉寄。 請收起憤怒的拳頭,讓我幫你們說說話,我知道怎麼樣用台北統媒那套冠冕堂皇的舌燦蓮花來回敬他們,台北統媒用他們熟悉的北京話與膚淺知識教訓南部單純的鄉 下人,我會幫你們向世界發出單純而美麗的聲音,強而有力的擊退那些紅衣人地下工廠。)

Wake Mr. Shih Ming Teh up from stone age

As a modern citizen, I'd use modern and legitimate approach to fight government's corruption but not use the old way to destroy the democracy we already earned for a decade in Taiwan. I'd like to urge Shih Ming Teh to stand up and to look around, Taiwan is no more under Chiang's dictatorship. There is no more martial law in Taiwan.

Mr. Shih's mind is still staying in 25 years ago. Mr. Shih is still  living in his own stone age. Those terrible old days had been ended. Mr. Shih has to learn a new way to solve current political dispute.

2006年9月20日 星期三

Daily Kos: Taiwan Protests: Media, Mob Rule and Democracy

Daily Kos: Taiwan Protests: Media, Mob Rule and Democracy

I recommend another article in Daily Kos, also written by vorkosigan.
His article is great not only because his insights but also nice photos on Taiwan. You can also visit his personal blog "The View from Taiwan".

再次推薦vorkosigan的另一篇文章 Taiwan Protests: Media, Mob Rule and Democracy,幫助您了解台灣的民主現況。
他的部落格不只文章深具對台灣的了解與洞見,更有讓人驚艷的台灣照片。你也可以參觀他個人的部落格 The View from Taiwan

Daily Kos: The Current Mess in Taiwan:

Daily Kos: The Current Mess in Taiwan:

I strongly recommend this article to readers who want to pick up the background of current "anti-corruption" political campaign in Taiwan.

This article is original from one of the world's most popular blog "Dailykos"

我強力推薦這篇文章給所有想了解現今台灣"反貪腐"行動背景的讀者。
這篇文章是出自於現今最受歡迎的部落格之一的"Dailykos"。

2006年9月19日 星期二

New Red Guard Movement in Taipei(IV): The Evidence

An entrepreneur who owns a photo frame shop close to the Taipei main station experienced a terrible night on Sep. 16. A group of pan-blue's red guards attempted to attack his store and terrified the owner and his wife because this frame shop owner had a President Chen's photo on display. The group of Shih's red guards left the store after the frame shop owner was forced to remove President Chen's photo and replaced it with former dictatorial President Chiang's photo.

The ridiculous thing is President Chiang is the man who put Shih Ming Teh in jail for over 20 years.

New Red Guard Movement in Taipei (III): The Evidence

I just had a meeting with a customer whose office is very close to Taipei Main Station , that is the place where pan-blue's red guard occupied for days. Because I did not wear red polo shirt today, I try not to get any closer to that dangerous zone.

When I watched this video on YouTube.com last night, I felt that Shih's slogan "Love & Peace" should be changed to "Hate & Violance". The elder lady who disagree pan-blue's campaign was attacked by a group of pan-blue's protesters. Is this "Love & Peace"?

I'd like to urge BBC, CNN, NPR, NY Times, WSJ and all international media to question Shih Ming Teh's and pan-blue's legitimacy of this campaign. The pan-blue coalition tries every means to fool Taiwanese people about how international media support their campaign to bring down President Chen, which might not be the truth. Please question pan-blue's leaders during their press conference. Don't be too kind to politicians who embrace "Hate & Violence" and who deliver fake messages and numbers to international media. You should remind them that they are "liers" and they are losing their credibility!

2006年9月18日 星期一

New Red Guard Movement in Taipei (II)


The protesters were asked by Shih Ming Teh to wear red clothes to show their angers at President Chen. However, the group of red protesters suddenly become the red threats to people who hold different opinions. The red protesters now call themselves the "red army" and occupy the plaza of Taipei main station. The protesters red identity now identifies who's their ally and who's not. The red army aroused people's memory of Mao Zedong's "Red Guard".

Several violent attacks from emotional red army have serious jeopardize Taiwanese freedom of choice. Several elder men and women who show their disagreement on Shih's campaign have been attacked by red army when waiting for buses in front of Taipei main station.

In today's TV talk show, Dong Chi Shen (董智森), a news commentator from TVBS news station, threatened Dr. Stephen M. Yang that he would group an array of pan-blue's red army to surround the American Institute in Taiwan just because Mr. Dong believed that Dr. Stephen M. Yang, the director of the Taipei Office of the American Institute in Taiwan, has sent manipulated information about Shih's campaign back to Washington D.C. The US government has long been the strong supporter of Taiwan. Dong Chi Shen's provocation immediately put American's offshore institution in danger and thus harm the partnership between Taiwan and United States. Dong Chi Shen's provocation carelessly reflected PRC's(Chinese) intention to disintegrate the mutual trust between Taiwan and the United States. Dong should be put into the list of global terrorists if he intents to do so. How can President George W. Bush tolerate Dong's threat to American embassy?

Taiwanese people have fought so hard to achieve democracy. President Chen's democratic reform gave recall motion and civil referendum a legitimate power but pan-blue coalition resisted any form of constitutional reform and even added strict restriction on Taiwanese civil referendum. Now, pan-blue pays the price of its anti-democracy standpoint but Taiwanese people cannot afford the pan-blue's street demonstration to corrupt their constitutional process.

New Red Guard Movement in Taipei (I)

A group of protesters led by former Democratic Progressive Party's chairman Shih Ming-Teh have become the new threat to Taiwanese democratic system. Backed by a group of media widely suspected as the agents and the voices of Chinese Communist Party, Shih Ming Teh, a politician lost his power in DPP, aligns with the opposite party(KMT) to oust President Chen Shui Bian in his recent "anti-corruption" campaign.

The anti-Chen Shui Bian's coalition(pan-blue) was formed when Chen was first elected to be the President of Taiwan in 2000. This alliance was further enhanced when Chen won the re-election campaign for his second term in 2004. Anti-Chen coalition(pan-blue) has taken every means to bring down Chen's administration since year 2000. The reputable Taiwanese economic growth has been serious damaged since pan-blue's campaign. This time, pan-blue's superficial cause of its campaign is "anti-corruption". However, majority of Taiwanese people have tired of its new pretext. The new wine of "anti-corruption" has been poured into the old bottle of "anti-Chen Shui Bian".

Pan-blue's anti-corruption campaign is an anti-democracy campaign in nature. They refused to admit Chen's presidency that backed by majority of Taiwanese voters, they refused to wait for the prosecutor's investigation over their accusation, they refused to take legal actions under Taiwanese constitution, and they even refused to accept their recent failing recall motion in pan-blue dominated congress. Pan-blue's immature practices are corrupting democratic system in Taiwan.

In pan-blue's "a million voices against corruption - Chen must go" campaign, majority of Taiwanese people cannot see any legitimate reason why pan-blue's a million voices can deny the presidency of Chen that elected by over 6.47 million legal voters.

倒扁挺扁行動的類比

常聽到有人說,媒體是台灣的亂源
對照起台灣媒體對倒扁行動的百般鼓勵與推崇,
難怪有人說,媒體才是倒扁行動後面的影舞者
我不知道這是對是錯,但許多媒體似乎把倒扁行動當作正義之師,
真是如此嗎?
在已經民主自由的國家當中,採用體制外非達目的不善罷甘休的倒扁行動若是合理的,
那麼,若將他們的行動對象從阿扁換成是特定媒體(如TVBS、中天),
對應倒扁總部的種種作為,
是否也讓人覺得!?
是否也讓人覺得是鬧劇一場!?

舉例來說:

倒扁行動
挺扁行動
包圍總統府
包圍TVBS
包圍玉山官邸
包圍李濤、李艷秋住宅
總統不下台、群眾不退場
李濤夫婦不永遠退出媒體、群眾不退場
全台大罷工、癱瘓台灣經濟
廣告主撤廣告、讓TVBS關台倒閉
反貪腐
反抹黑造謠、反侵害人權
圍城
圍電視台
要讓陳總統成為關在總統府的囚犯
讓李濤李艷秋成為關在電視台的囚犯
人民對阿扁不滿
人民對李濤夫婦的作為不齒
不信任司法、一人一信給檢察官施壓
不信任司法、一人一信給檢察官施壓

各位民主法治社會的國民,這樣做好嗎?我把問題留給各位思考!

2006年9月16日 星期六

倒扁?挺扁?包圍總統府之後呢?民眾可以包圍電視台嗎?

若紅色倒扁民眾包圍總統府、包圍總統官邸,策動罷工,
搞垮台灣經濟與國力是一種社會正義的表現,
相對的,台灣民眾是否也可以仿照他們的邏輯與做法,
層層包圍電視台,

包圍TVBS、

包圍中天電視台,

包圍李濤與李艷秋的住宅

讓他們一個月上不了節目呢?

若TVBS、中天電視台被包圍,
一個月都播不出新聞、所有記者都無法進出電視台,
電視新聞台會不會倒台呢?
台灣民眾堅持不是你TVBS倒,不是你中天新聞倒,
就是我們台灣民眾倒,不達目的就沒有退場機制,情況又會如何?

我不知道,只是提供給大家一個思考的方向。
這也跟范可欽先生一樣,只是一個生意人的創意想法。

tipping888